DumpDumanis.com

There will be no justice, no rule of law in place and no peace for taxpayers who fund her shenanigans, until Bonnie Dumanis is removed from office. The purpose of this site is to compile stories about Bonnie Dumanis into one common source that will be readily available to investigators, or any attorney who has the courage to run - in the 2010 election - for office against Bonnie Dumanis and her gang of criminal associates.

Also, there's a complete review of the scam-case Bonnie Dumanis brought against Joe Ryan in order to harass him and drain him of resources and time. The review shows that Bonnie Dumanis is a common criminal and a true traitor in every sense of the word, who has NO regard for the constitution, and no use for ethics standards or other obstacles in her path & who cannot be trusted to hold any position of responsiblity.

This site was created by Joe Ryan, an Independent Candidate for California's 52nd Congressional District Seat in 2010

This site is not directly related to my campaign for congress, but it does reflect my views about Bonnie Dumanis and her suitability to serve as a prosecutor. I think Bonnie Dumanis is unfit to hold any office. I think she is mentally unstable. And I think she is a criminal of the worst sort, running interference for organized crime and using her office as a hammer to harass political opponents, anyone who catches her friends or associates stealing, and opponents of globalism in general. She's been insulated from political criticism by the press because she's gay and Jewish. So what, a crook is a crook. And a hypocrite is a hypocrite no matter their religious or sexual preference. JR

SITE-BUILDING IN PROGRESS; PLEASE BE PATIENT WHILE WE COMPLETE THE SITE AS TIME ALLOWS

E-Mail Joe Ryan

Call 1-877-563-1116

THE MENU

ISSUES AT STAKE:

Community Issues:

1. Taxpayer Resources being stolen

If you read the background page you'll realize that taxpayer resources are being used in order to support partisan candidates for office. That's blatantly unfair to the 25% or more of the voters/taxpayers who do not associate with the Republican, Democratic, or Libertarian parties. Why should taxes paid by persons registered independent, fund events that support only the Republican, Democratic, and Libertarian Party candidates? The law says it can't and should not be done, but Grossmont-Cuyamaca college officials ignore the law to help their political and business allies. That must be stopped.

2. Chamber has transformed Grossmont College into their quasi-headquarters. They use the college facilities to generate relatively large amounts of income, at taxpayer expense

No private party has a right to seize our college campus facilities in order to make up for the fact that the organization in question is too weakly funded or unable to afford their own facilities. If the East County Chamber of Commerce and the Viejas tribe fascist want to host partisan, money-making events where donations, admission charges, and table fees are collected, maybe they should confine their activities to properties they own.

3. Grossmont College officials have been intimately involved in gifting of facilities to Chamber

Dana Quittner, Henri Magala and a whole host of Board members, college presidents, and other college officials from Grossmont-Cuyamaca College District are intimately involved in arranging the Chamber's events on campus, and running interference designed to disguise the illegal nature of the events being held regularly on the college's campuses

4. Grossmont College officials are perverting the very purpose of college's existence, and abusing the students in the process, in order to aid Chamber's illegal use of school facilities. That needs to be stopped.

Chamber of Commerce events are interfering with the conduct of the campus and causing great inconvenience to the student body, in direct contravention of the law, by hogging-up limited parking facilities and taking over the Grossmont School cafeteria on a regular basis. Also, school equipment and employee resources that are supposed to support education activities are used without limit, to support private Chamber events held on the college districts two campuses. That needs to stop.

5. Grossmont College officials and officers of The Grossmont Police Department have conspired to deprive Joe Ryan of rights guaranteed him by both the California and US constitutions, and they continue to conspire in the same manner, in order to cover up the colleges illegal gifting of the use of its facilities, and the Police Departments unlawful arrest of Joe Ryan. That kind of behavior is reprehensible and an insult to all persons who pay taxes or who fought and died for the constitution. See background facts section for further details

6. Chamber officials, Grossmont college officials, and persons connected to Hunter campaign planned and executed an illegal rout, and none our being investigated or prosecuted

While Joe Ryan is being illegally persecuted/prosecuted by Bonnie Dumanis for his speech, it's clear from all available evidence, that a rout was planned and executed by persons connected with The East County Chamber of Commerce, Duncan Hunter's campaign, and grossmont college officials; and that none of the parties that planned and executed the rout that occurred, are being investigated or prosecuted at all. It's clear from the available evidence that college officials purposefully ignored the activities of participants in the rout in order to aid the plan.

Note: A "rout" is a legal term that refers to an action involving two or more persons acting in concert, that involves wholly unconstitutionally protected activity that comes close to meeting the definition of a 'riot'. California criminal-law statutes make it illegal for anyone to plan and carry out a rout at a public meeting; and any public meeting where a rout occurs is rendered an 'illegal assembly' once a rout rout begins.

7. The San Diego Media was also involved in instigating Joe Ryan's unlawful arrest/kidnapping under-the-color-of-the-law. What's wrong with that scenario?

The San Diego Media was also involved in instigating Joe Ryan's arrest and two stations are now hiding their tapes of the event in order to help dumanis carry her weak/garbage case, and to cover up their own employees involvement. Doesn't that only happen in places like Russia?? What the hell is the media doing trying to get Joe Ryan arrested for speaking at a public facility at a time and place, where the applicable law indicates he had every right to be, and to speak?? What is going on in San Diego? KUSI, Fox-5 and Unioun_tribune reporter Michele Clock need to come clean about their roles in this matter! Even pravda would explain itself.

Legal Issues: (repeated at start of caselaw section)

1. What party was the actual 'sponsor' of the debate held at Cuyamaca College on 10/22/08. The Chamber of Commerce, a party who apparently made no payment for use of the school's facilities, or is the actual sponsor of the debate the school itself (since the school provided the facility, college resources, and employee resources needed to put on the event)? Determining who was the real sponsor of the debate is relevant to what type of forum (for constitutional purposes) took place. And determining what type of forum occurred is relevant to the rights of Joe Ryan to participate in the debate that occurred on 10/22/08 at the Cuyamaca college student center.

2. According to the wording of the statute Joe Ryan is charged with violating (Penal Code section 403), Joe Ryan cannot be convicted unless he acted with an intent to disturb the meeting in question, not if he acted with an intent to merely participate and speak at the meeting/debate in question

3. Was Joe Ryan arrested because his act of standing on the stage stopped the debate from proceeding or was he arrested because of his his speech? If the debate could have proceeded despite Joe Ryan standing silently somewhere on the stage, then for legal purposes, Joe Ryan cannot be convicted of the charge. Note: The moderator of the debate (Steve Bosch of KUSI) declared to the crowd that Joe Ryan's presence on the stage would not inhibit his ability to conduct the debate, as Steve Bosch of KUSI declared to the crowd, "let him stay, I just won't ask him any questions".

4. According to the wording of the statute Joe Ryan is charged with violating (Penal Code section 403), Joe Ryan cannot be convicted unless his conduct occurred at a type of public meeting that is not considered to be a political-type meeting. The purpose of the exemption declared in Penal Code section 403 pertaining to it's unavailability for use at political meetings, accounts for the fact that the legislature decided to set-up three separate standards pertaining to how a person could violate a statute by 'disrupting' or 'disturbing' a particular type of meeting. The legislature decided that in order to disturb a church service, all a person would have to do is make an 'unnecessary noise' during the service, and to disrupt a political-type meeting or assembly a person would have to commit violence or threaten to commit violence (in order to disrupt the meeting). Penal Code section 403 applies to all other types of meetings that are not 'church services' or 'political meetings'. Bonnie Dumanis knows Joe Ryan did not commit violence or threaten anyone, so she has no statute to harass Joe Ryan with unless she can claim that the debate held on the Cuyamaca Campus was not a meeting of a political nature. Note: The statute that defines a political meeting, (Cal Elections Code section 18340) states that a political meeting is a meeting where "electors assemble to considering public questions". That would seem to fit the exact definition of what a debate is. A debate is obviously a ' political meeting' per the plain language of the law, but Bonnie Dumanis is a criminal who is using her power to illegally harass Joe Ryan, so the law does not matter. Bonnie has no right to bring charges she knows are not supported by the law. That's a crime, but nobody in law enforcement will touch, untouchable Bonnie. They are too scared of her power and don't want it turned-on them or their organization's members.

5. According to applicable caselaw (se in re kay and the cases that follow in re Kay), if Joe Ryan was arrested for breaking explicit debate rules or implicit customs and usages pertaining to the debate held at Cuyamaca college, he cannot be found guilty if he had an honest, good faith belief in his legal-right to violate whatever rules were being applied to the debate event. Joe Ryan has always believed and still adamantly believes to this day that he has every legal right in the world to participate in the debate held at Cuyamaca college on 10/22/08. There's is no evidence in existence that indicates that Joe Ryan does not honestly believe, or did not honestly believe on 10/22/08, that he had no right to participate in the debate he was arrested at.

6. Since explicit debate rules were not announced by the moderator until after Joe Ryan's arrest, Joe Ryan must be charged with violating implicit customs and usages pertaining to the debate event. Joe Ryan cannot be found to have violated a custom and usage pertaining to the debate, if 'the speaking and airing of grievances' is conduct that is generally accepted at the start of a political debate. Note: The California Supreme Court has already found that 'the speaking and airing of grievances' that relates to a dispute about the governance of the meeting, is the type of conduct that is generally expected and accepted at the start of a political-type meeting.

7. According to the California constitution and statutory law, (as explained by the California Supreme Court), the legislature did not intend that Penal Code section 403 be used to initiate criminal proceedings against someone who argues at a meeting but does not commit violence or threaten others at the meeting with violence. The law allows for a person to be detained and removed from a meeting in certain circumstances, but it does not allow for the criminal prosecution of the person detained for breaking meeting rules or arguing in a manner that other meeting participants judge to be out-of-order or disruptive to someone's mental state.

8. According to relevant caselaw, no person can be prosecuted for disturbing or disrupting a meeting where the actual conduct of the meeting was not 'substantially' impaired. Note: The debate started approximately 2 1/2 minutes later than it might have (if a dispute over the participation rules had not been aired by Joe Ryan). It lasted from approximately 7:05pm to 9:15pm. The debate was completed fully as it was scheduled to run for two hours. The debate organizer even allowed the debate to continue an extra 10 minutes over the announced two-hour time-period set for the debate.

9. According to applicable caselaw, Joe Ryan cannot be prosecuted for arguing with others at a political meeting unless he committed an act of violence or threatened others with violence. That obviously did not happen (as all recordings of the event conclusively prove).

10. Warnings that were allegedly given to Joe Ryan before his arrest, must not have been generic in nature. The warnings must have included 'notice of the conduct that was in doubt'. In other words, if the officer just said, 'I am warning you to leave the stage', or 'you must leave the stage now', his warning would be ineffective if it did not include a statement such as 'You must leave the stage because you have refused to stop talking after your two-minute time limit expired', or words to the same effect, that explained to Joe Ryan why he was required to remove himself from the debate stage (under threat of arrest). If Joe Ryan was removed from the after warnings were given to him, that did not include the reasons he was being ordered to act in a certain way, the arrest was unlawful.

11. Did law enforcement officials and officers like Ryan Montalvan, Joel Javins and others join up with Chamber officials and Grossmont college officials in a dedicated plan to strip Joe Ryan of rights guaranteed by the constitution? The evidence sure indicates that's exactly what occurred In other words, Police officials have engaged in Gross misconduct. In addition to hiding evidence, committing perjury, and conspiring with East County Chamber of Commerce officials, the Grossmont Police departments has slanted its 'investigation' of the matter at hand in order to train and concentrate its law enforcement powers solely on Joe Ryan. The Police Department of Grossmont College is breaking numerous laws in an all-out effort concentrated on criminalizing Joe Ryan's legally justified, valid behavior; the same department ignores all evidence of criminal behavior by other parties present at the debate held on 10/22/08. Gross misconduct by Police officials serves as a bar to Joe Ryan's prosecution.

12. Did a 'rout' occur before Joe Ryan's arrest? If so, the assembly was rendered an 'illegal assembly' and according to the California Supreme Court, Joe Ryan cannot be arrested for disturbing an illegal assembly.

13. Finally, has all the misconduct, cheating, and dishonest behavior engaged in by Bonnie Dumanis and her assistants risen well-beyond the level where it would have to be labeled gross prosecutorial misconduct (which would serve as a bar to the prosecution of Joe Ryan)?

DUMANIS CORRUPTION

Dumanis v. Ryan

Background Facts

Background Facts

Issues at Stake

Links to Statutes and Opinions relevant to Case

Citation

Notice of Complaint

Defenses informal request for Discovery

Judge's Order after arraignment

My Demur (filed at arraignment)

DA Answer/Opposition to my Demur

My Response to DA's Demur opposition

Judge's Order from Demur Hearing with Recording of Hearing

Initial Discovery Defense received from DA (three police reports & DA's complaint)

2 More requests for Discovery by Defense (first is general, second specific)

List of Discovery turned over by defense to DA (compare to pile of non-specific bunk DA turned-over to defense)

Defense's Motion to Compel

Defense's Motion for Sanctions

DA's Opposition to Defense Motion-to-Compel

Defense's Request for further Missing/Hidden Discovery from DA

Defense's Response to DA's MTC Opposition

List of Recordings Finally Turned Over by DA on April 14th, with links to the most relevant audio and video, and including links to related PD reports (proving dishonesty of PD reports)

List of Discovery material (e-mails referenced in DA's demur filing), finally turned over to Defense on April 21st with links e-mails relevant to case

Motion To Compel Hearing #1, Judge's Order with Recording of Hearing

Motion To Compel Hearing #2, Judge's Order with Recording of Hearing

List with links to First Round of Subpoena's sent out by Defense

Dispatch Recordings (audio files) turned over to Defense on 4/28

Letter to DA from Defense regarding involuntary Contact with witness

List of Documents turned over to defense on 4/28 with links to Chamber's Facility-Use Applications

Notification Letter sent by defense to DA, notifying Dumanis that her assistant DA suborned perjury, & links to Recordings and databases included with the notification letter, that prove DA and witness corruption, beyond any shadow of a doubt.

Two Articles wherein Bonnie Dumanis ran out and covered herself, just after getting my notification letter (just in case SDPravda ever tells the public about my secret persecution and trial)

Letter to DA requesting that DA's office turn over results of crime investigation (they claimed would be started sometime after the defense's motion to compel was heard)

NOTE FROM JOE RYAN. There are no links to any corrspondence received from the DA, because the DA's office simply ignores my correspondence and never responds in writing at all. Bringing charges to harass political opponents is fun when you don't even have to follow-up and actually do anything but lie and cheat, after filing the charges. That's Bonnie. Completely amoral, dishonest, mentally unstable and corrupt to the core.